A shift out of nuclear power will require a $290 billion investment but could create hundreds of thousands of jobs and an energy mix dominated by alternatives.
US national security agencies recognize the seriousness of the climate change threat. Why aren't America's other policymakers responding?
The energy future must take into account the needs of the world's growing population and protect the future viability of the planet. And this does not come without risk.
Before this month's tragedy in Japan, many were confident that reactor design and safety had matured and catastrophic accidents were simply not going to happen. Fukushima has proven these assumptions wrong -- and it will have a number of implications for the energy debate.
Reflections on the life and accomplishments of Stephen Schneider, 1945-2010.
For far too long the nuclear weapon states have ignored one of the most devastating causes of significant climate change--nuclear war.
Climate change is poised to challenge U.S. security at home and abroad by affecting military facilities, strategies, and resources. Adaptation must start now.
Instead of pouring resources into expensive geoengineering research, we should pursue low-tech reproductive health and women's empowerment programs that have widespread social benefits and can reduce CO2 emissions.
Climate negotiations are at a standstill as developed and developing countries argue over who should limit their carbon emissions first. But there is a way to break the roadblock.
More and more, climate change is becoming part of the national security dialogue. We must tackle the dangers without exaggerating the threats from still-unfolding changes.
Scientists are considering several approaches to slowing and even reversing the pandemic deterioration of river deltas.
After years of neglect, the Energy Department is being asked to transform itself and the country's energy policies. But can it succeed?
Instead of investing in flawed energy resources such as coal and nuclear power, the U.S. government should stimulate the green energy industries of the future.
In setting his energy agenda, Barack Obama will likely consider a range of priorities, among them emphasizing investment in electricity transmission technology.
Campaign promises and hopes for a green energy future depend on fundamental reform at the Energy Department, long one of the government's most dysfunctional offices.
The United States must resist the urge to use climate change as the latest excuse to continue to fund the war on terror at record levels.
OPEC might blame speculators, terrorism, and the Iraq War for inflated oil prices, but the organization itself controls price through marginal supply and demand.
California's low-carbon fuel standard demonstrates to the rest of the world how markets can lead the way toward cleaner fuel sources.